SCLC is less common than NSCLC but more aggressive
Class action litigation promised a strategy for documenting collective harm, but an increasingly conservative judicial and political climate limited this strategy
This First Chamber concludes that the prohibition contained in articles 235, last paragraph, 237, 245, section I, 247, last paragraph, and 248 of the General Health Law, effectively affects the prima facie content of the analyzed fundamental right, since it constitutes a legal obstacle that prevents the exercise of the right to decide what type of recreational activities an individual wishes to carry out, while also preventing one from lawfully carrying out all the actions or activities necessary to be able to materialize that choice through the self-consumption of marijuana: sowing, cultivation, harvesting, preparation, conditioning, possession, transport, etc. Available at [4] The following is a translation of the conclusion of the text: FREEDOM OF COMMERCE OR PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY
E., Loukas, A., Prokhorov, A
